Raffle Tickets Printable: Easy Design & Print
You've said yes to helping with the raffle. Then the practical questions land all at once. What should the ticket look like, how many should y
May 18, 2026 | 20 Min Read
You can feel when a card is almost there but still hard to read. The message works, the photos are good, and the jokes land. Then the layout starts fighting for attention, especially on a busy farewell board or shared group card with notes coming in from different people.
Arrow clip art solves a practical layout problem. It directs the eye to the main message, ties captions to images, marks the order of a timeline, and points people toward a signature, video, or gift link. On Firacard boards and other group greeting cards, that kind of guidance matters because contributors rarely upload content in one consistent style.
The challenge is not finding arrows. It is choosing arrows that match the tone of the card, stay readable at small sizes, and come with terms you can use without second-guessing the licence later. I also look for assets that pair well with other celebration graphics, especially if a board needs coordinating elements such as birthday cake clip art for group card layouts.
If you also make printable cards, posters, or card merch, the same selection habits carry over to physical products and small design workflows. That practical mindset overlaps with learning how to become a print mogul from home.
The resources below are worth comparing if you need arrows for ecards, collaborative boards, internal celebrations, or lightweight design work without hiring a designer.

Freepik is where I'd start if the problem is visual variety. It's strong when you don't just need one arrow, but a matching set in the same style. That matters on a card or board where one sketched arrow, one glossy arrow, and one rigid corporate icon can make the whole thing feel patched together.
Its catalogue is broad enough that you can usually find hand-drawn arrows for casual cards, cleaner flat arrows for workplace recognition, or more polished gradient vectors for modern promo-style designs. For non-designers, that “same family” effect is often more important than picking the fanciest asset.
Freepik is good for card makers who want a themed pack rather than a single isolated symbol. If you're designing a birthday board with cakes, balloons, labels, and directional flourishes, it's useful to pair the arrows with related decorative assets such as this guide to birthday cake clip art ideas.
A few trade-offs matter:
Practical rule: If several colleagues are building cards under one brand style, pick one pack and reuse it. Don't let each person download a different arrow.
Freepik also suits teams that need centralised licensing rather than one-off personal downloads. That's helpful if HR, internal comms, and culture teams all touch the same materials. Just check the exact licence terms attached to the asset you choose on Freepik, because plan details can vary.
Vecteezy is one of the easiest libraries to recommend when licensing clarity matters as much as design choice. It has a large enough catalogue to cover infographic arrows, directional arrows, curved pointer arrows, and cleaner vector shapes without feeling overcomplicated.
That scale is visible in its own marketplace, where Vecteezy's Arrow Statistics results show more than 27,000 vector assets. For practical use, that tells you arrow clip art isn't a niche corner of design. It's a well-stocked category with enough depth to be selective.
Vecteezy strikes a good balance between breadth and usability. The online editor is handy when you only need to tweak colour or simplify an arrow before dropping it into a card. That's enough for many non-designers who don't want to open Illustrator for a tiny edit.
I'd consider it especially useful when making explanatory visuals inside a card or board. For example, arrows can connect a message to a photo, point to a “sign here” note, or direct readers through a collage. That same principle shows up in visual storytelling like pictures with words for cards and posts.
Clear licensing saves more time than clever design. If you're making something for a workplace, school, or client, uncertainty is usually the bigger risk than mediocre art.
For a lot of users, that's Vecteezy's main advantage. It doesn't try to be mysterious. You can browse and compare on Vecteezy and make a practical call quickly.

You're building a Firacard board, the messages are in place, the photos look good, and one small problem remains. Readers do not know where to look next. That is the kind of job Flaticon handles well.
Flaticon is strongest for arrow clip art that needs to behave like a clean signpost, not a decorative illustration. I use it when a card needs a tidy pointer beside a caption, a directional cue toward a photo, or a simple sequence marker that stays out of the way. For group greeting cards, that matters. An arrow should guide attention across names, notes, and images without making the board feel busy.
The main advantage is consistency. Flaticon has large icon families, so it is easier to keep every arrow in the same visual style across a whole board. That helps when several people contribute content and the layout already has enough variation from different photos, fonts, and message lengths.
It also fits small-format design well. Thin icon arrows usually hold up better than ornate vector art once you shrink them into labels, corner notes, or quick prompts. If you need to crop an arrow into a tighter composition, the same basic editing approach used in a clipping mask in Photoshop for cleaner compositions works well here too.
What Flaticon does well:
Trade-offs matter here.
That last point is the one non-designers often miss. On Firacard boards and other group cards, arrows should support the message flow, not compete with it. Use one to point to a signature area, connect a note to a photo, or guide people through a collage. Stop there unless the card genuinely needs more.
Browse it directly at Flaticon.

Pixabay is the practical option when you need a free arrow and don't want to spend half the afternoon dealing with a maze of credits. It's useful for simple projects, low-risk internal materials, quick mock-ups, and one-off cards where the arrow is a minor supporting element.
The appeal is obvious. You can usually search, download, and move on without much friction. But Pixabay requires more visual judgement from you because quality and consistency vary a lot from contributor to contributor.
If the arrow is small, basic, and not central to the design, Pixabay can do the job well. I'd use it for straightforward callouts, scrapbook-style cards, or quick edits where the design already carries personality through photos and messages.
It also helps if you plan to customise the asset after download. Even a basic arrow can become more polished once you recolour it, trim extra points, or mask it around an image. That's the same sort of lightweight editing mindset behind using a clipping mask in Photoshop for cleaner compositions.
The free asset isn't the problem. Mixing five unrelated free assets usually is.
Before using any item commercially, read the terms attached to the file and the platform guidance on Pixabay. It's convenient, but convenience isn't the same as blanket permission.

You are halfway through a group card, the messages are in place, and the layout still feels loose. A plain arrow can fix that fast. Wikimedia Commons is useful in exactly that moment, especially if you want an editable SVG instead of a polished stock graphic.
Its value is practical, not cosmetic. Commons is one of the better places to find straightforward arrow files you can recolour, resize, rotate, and adapt for Firacard boards, classroom posters, process visuals, or team celebration cards. If the job is to point readers to a photo, signature, inside joke, or next step, simple usually works better than decorative.
The main advantage here is control. Many Commons arrow files are basic vector shapes with no unnecessary texture, shadow, or styling baked in. That gives non-designers more room to make the arrow match the card instead of forcing the card to match the asset.
That matters on collaborative boards. A farewell card might need arrows that guide people from a cover message to team photos. A birthday board might use arrows to connect captions, dates, and small memories in a timeline format. If you are building that kind of layout, a plain vector arrow often fits better than a glossy stock illustration, especially if you are following a more structured birthday card layout approach.
There is a trade-off. Commons asks you to do more of the quality check yourself.
I use Wikimedia Commons when the arrow is doing a job, not trying to carry the design. That is often the right call on group greeting cards, because the primary focus should stay on the messages and shared photos.
Browse the collection on Wikimedia Commons.
The Noun Project is where minimalist arrow clip art starts to feel intentional instead of generic. It's designer-curated, so styles tend to be cleaner and more coherent than broad contributor marketplaces. If you're making a modern group card and want every icon to look like it belongs together, that matters.
Its strength isn't flamboyance. It's discipline. You go there for arrows that behave well alongside text, interface elements, labels, and small decorative marks.
The Noun Project works well when your card needs visual restraint. For example, a company farewell board may need arrows to highlight team photos, point to a final message, and guide readers through sections without looking childish or loud.
This is also a good fit for recurring templates. If your organisation creates birthday ecards, welcome boards, leaving cards, and appreciation walls in the same general style, a curated icon system is easier to maintain than hunting across random stock sites every time.
One practical downside is that some arrows can become too abstract. Minimal doesn't always mean clearer. On cards for mixed audiences, choose the icon someone understands immediately, not the one a designer admires.
You can review styles and licensing options on The Noun Project.
Adobe Stock is the enterprise-safe option. It's where I'd look when the arrow is part of a professional deliverable and the design work already lives in Illustrator, Photoshop, or other Creative Cloud tools.
The depth of its catalogue is one of the clearest signals of how broad the arrow category has become. Adobe Stock's arrow chart search lists about 1.6 million assets. That kind of volume is useful because you can narrow by format, style, and professional quality instead of settling for whatever appears on page one.
Adobe Stock makes the most sense when your team already uses Adobe software and wants fewer handoffs. Downloading vectors directly into the tools you're already using removes friction, especially when a card turns into a poster, intranet banner, PDF handout, or internal campaign graphic.
Its practical value isn't just volume. It's workflow. For mixed-use outputs, vector-native formats help avoid blurry upscaling and awkward rework later. That's especially relevant when one arrow needs to look sharp in a slide, a printable sign, and a digital card.
There's another reason Adobe Stock stands out in team settings. Arrow clip art is often part of a broader vector illustration workflow, not a one-off icon hunt. If your team treats design assets as shared infrastructure, Adobe Stock UK is built for that model.

Shutterstock is the familiar middle ground between broad marketplace energy and established corporate procurement habits. Many legal and brand teams already know how Shutterstock licensing works, which removes a lot of friction when card graphics move beyond casual personal use.
Its search quality is usually good when you need something specific. That includes infographic arrows, sketched arrows, growth arrows, finance arrows, and cleaner UI-friendly vectors. For niche styles, it often surfaces useful results faster than smaller libraries.
This is a strong option when your arrow needs a specific tone. For example, a sales kickoff card might need upward chart-style arrows, while a farewell card might need friendly hand-drawn arrows around memories and messages. Shutterstock usually gives enough range for both.
The downside is that it can be easy to overbuy. If all you need is a tiny directional pointer, a premium stock subscription may be more infrastructure than the task deserves.
Pick Shutterstock when the search itself is the problem. If you already know the exact style you need and can find it elsewhere, you may not need the extra overhead.
It's also useful if your organisation occasionally wants animated or template-based assets alongside still vectors. For broader commercial asset needs, that flexibility can justify the platform. Browse available files and licensing on Shutterstock.

iStock is a practical choice for buyers who want a curated library without stepping fully into heavyweight enterprise procurement. It feels business-friendly, and the collection depth for arrow visuals is substantial.
Two category pages show how broad demand is. iStock's arrow infographic results list 154,700+ illustrations, and iStock's stock market arrow results list about 70,192 illustrations. That range tells you the platform covers both presentation-friendly arrows and more specialised commercial imagery.
iStock suits teams that want predictability. If you need a straightforward route to commercial-use graphics for HR cards, internal campaigns, and recognition materials, it offers a more managed feel than free libraries.
That said, you still need to match the licence to the use case. A one-off team ecard is very different from a reusable template product, a printed merchandise line, or a design sold onward. That's where many buyers slip.
This also ties into a wider practical issue in digital-first workplaces. The core question often isn't where to download arrow clip art, but whether the asset is editable, legally safe, and compatible across slides, PDFs, print, and online delivery, as discussed in this format-and-licensing perspective on arrow asset use. Start your review on iStock.

Icons8 is excellent when your arrow clip art needs to look like part of a digital product or modern interface. The arrows are polished, consistent, and often available in multiple styles, including solid, outline, and animated variants.
That makes it especially useful for online cards, event microsites, team pages, and collaborative boards that blur the line between design and interface. If your card lives on screen first and print second, Icons8 is often a better fit than an illustration-heavy stock site.
Icons8 works well when you want a coherent visual system across arrows, buttons, symbols, and small decorative icons. If the board includes navigation prompts, labels, reactions, or structured content blocks, the library's consistency becomes a real advantage.
It's less useful when you want expressive scene-building art. If the brief calls for painterly arrows, scrapbook flourishes, or big illustrated compositions, Icons8 can feel too sleek.
There's also a wider market signal behind why these polished arrow sets are easy to find. Large asset libraries have made arrow visuals a standard design building block, and VectorStock's profit arrow collection lists about 75,288 vectors, reinforcing how mature this category has become. If UI-style consistency is the priority, start with Icons8.
| Resource | Core offering | Licensing & cost | Best for | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freepik | Massive library of vector arrow art & PNGs | Free with attribution; paid tiers remove attribution & add access | Designers and teams needing cohesive packs | Huge, well-tagged catalogue; consistent packs | Free requires attribution; regional pricing changes |
| Vecteezy | Vectors, SVGs, PNGs + online editor | Free with attribution; Pro removes attribution & grants commercial rights | Teams needing predictable licensing | Clear licence model; easy quick edits | Free requires attribution; subscription promos vary |
| Flaticon | Millions of icon-style arrows (SVG/PNG) | Free with attribution; Premium removes attribution | UI designers & small decorative arrows | Fast to source consistent UI sets; Freepik integration | Focused on iconography not complex illustrations |
| Pixabay | Free clip art & vectors under Pixabay Licence | Generally free for commercial use, no attribution usually required | Budget projects and simple designs | No-cost downloads; broad commercial allowance | Cannot redistribute unaltered assets as stock; variable quality |
| Wikimedia Commons (SVG Arrows) | Large repository of SVG arrows with file-level licences | Mostly free (public domain/CC); attribution may be required per file | Technical diagrams, infographics, editable vectors | Many permissive licences; great for editable vectors | Must check each file licence; inconsistent curation |
| The Noun Project | Designer-curated minimalist icon arrows + editor | Free with attribution; paid options remove attribution or offer subscription | Brands seeking consistent minimalist icons | Consistent visual language; flexible buy/subscription | Free needs attribution; resale restrictions apply |
| Adobe Stock (UK) | Curated professional vectors & templates, Creative Cloud integration | Paid subscriptions / licenses; enterprise options | Enterprises & creative teams using CC | Strong rights management; enterprise support | Higher cost; must choose right licence for use |
| Shutterstock | Broad commercial catalogue including infographic arrows | Paid subscription or on-demand; business plans available | Corporate teams needing mature licensing | Mature licensing, strong search, enterprise options | Pricier than community sites; monitor licence types |
| iStock (Getty) | Curated vectors with Essentials & Signature collections | Pay-as-you-go or subscription; clear licence tiers | Teams needing predictable legal guarantees | Transparent licence guidance; legal guarantees | Extended licences cost more for resale/large print |
| Icons8 | Polished icon sets (static & animated) + plugins | Subscription / licence under Universal Multimedia Licence | UI/UX teams wanting brand-consistent icons | Simple licence model; plugins for Figma etc. | Focused on icons, not complex illustrations |
You open a group card, add a few photos, drop in several messages from the team, and the layout starts to feel crowded fast. A well-chosen arrow clip art element fixes that in seconds. It gives the eye a path to follow, shows what belongs together, and helps the main sentiment stand out instead of getting lost among decorations.
The practical choice is not the site with the biggest library. It is the source that fits the job. For playful or decorative arrows, Freepik gives you range. For editable vectors with simpler day-to-day use, Vecteezy is often easier to work with. For small directional icons on boards, labels, or captions, Flaticon and Icons8 usually do the job better than a broad stock library.
Free options still have a place. Pixabay and Wikimedia Commons can be useful for quick internal pieces, test layouts, or one-off cards where budget matters more than visual consistency. The trade-off is time. Someone still needs to check the licence, confirm commercial use if relevant, and make sure the arrow style does not clash with the rest of the card.
Paid libraries make more sense when the design may be reused. Adobe Stock, Shutterstock, and iStock are easier to manage in workplace settings because the licence trail is clearer and the quality floor is higher. That matters when a simple card graphic later gets reused in a slide, printed poster, internal newsletter, or template for the next team event.
Small details matter here.
The best arrow is usually the one that reads clearly at a glance. On collaborative greeting cards and Firacard-style boards, that often means a simple vector arrow with clean edges, good contrast, and enough visual weight to guide attention without taking over the page. Decorative hand-drawn arrows can work well around personal notes or scrapbook-style photo clusters, but they tend to fail if the board already has busy backgrounds, stickers, or multiple fonts.
Accessibility is part of the selection process too. An arrow should support nearby text, not replace it. If the meaning depends on colour alone, points at multiple items, or becomes fuzzy at mobile size, it is the wrong asset for a shared card where people may be viewing quickly on different screens.
For non-designers, a few rules prevent most mistakes. Keep to one arrow style per card. Match the stroke weight of the arrow to the fonts or icons already on the board. Use arrows to connect names to photos, point to a key message, or guide readers through a sequence. If an arrow is bigger than the headline or appears more than a few times, it is probably doing too much.
Whether you are building a quick birthday ecard or a more detailed leaving or appreciation card, restraint usually produces the better result. Choose a source that matches your workflow, confirm the usage rights before publishing, and pick arrows that help people read the card faster. That is what makes a group card feel intentional instead of cluttered.
If you want a faster way to turn photos, messages, GIFs, and simple visual touches into a polished team card, Firacard makes it easy to build collaborative ecards for birthdays, farewells, appreciation, and more. Create a board, invite the group with a shareable link, and deliver something personal without chasing paper cards around the office.
You've said yes to helping with the raffle. Then the practical questions land all at once. What should the ticket look like, how many should y
You know the scene. A visitor arrives at reception, the pen has wandered off, the top half of the page is full of cramped handwriting, and someone
You're probably here because a plain message feels too small for the moment. A leaving note in Slack can feel rushed. A birthday text can feel