You've probably seen this happen. A new project starts, everyone joins the first meeting on time, people smile, nod, and say they're excited. Then two weeks later the cracks show. Messages get missed, roles blur, one person takes over, another goes quiet, and the team lead starts wondering why a group of capable people isn't clicking yet.

That's exactly why Tuckman's stages of group development still matters. It gives leaders a simple way to understand what a team is going through, what behaviour is normal, and where support is needed most. For HR teams, line managers, school leaders, and project owners across the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada, India and Africa, the model is especially useful now that so much work happens across time zones, chat platforms, and hybrid routines.

Why Every Team Leader Needs to Understand Tuckman

A team doesn't become effective just because talented people are placed in the same meeting invite. It becomes effective when people learn how to work together under pressure, with real deadlines, competing ideas, and different habits.

That's where Bruce Tuckman's model helps. Bruce Tuckman first proposed the four-stage model of group development in 1965 through his paper Developmental sequence in small groups, identifying Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. In 1977, he and Mary Ann Jensen added Adjourning to describe what happens when a team completes its work and disbands, as outlined in the history of Tuckman's stages of group development.

Why the model still works

The appeal of the model is simple. It gives managers a map.

Without a map, leaders often misread normal team behaviour as failure. Early politeness can look like harmony when it's really uncertainty. Disagreement can feel like dysfunction when it's a sign that people are finally being honest. Smooth performance can be mistaken for permanent stability, even though one staffing change can send a team back into friction.

Practical rule: Don't ask, “What's wrong with this team?” Ask, “What stage is this team in?”

That question changes the manager's job. Instead of reacting emotionally, you start diagnosing patterns. You clarify roles in the early phase, coach through conflict in the middle, and step back once the group becomes more self-directed.

Why leaders need this in remote and hybrid work

Remote and hybrid teams make the invisible parts of teamwork harder to spot. Tension hides behind polite chat messages. Confusion lingers because people aren't overhearing the same office conversations. Silence in a video call can mean agreement, uncertainty, or disengagement.

That's why communication skill matters as much as process. Leaders who are working on mastering executive presence often find they're better able to give direction calmly, handle disagreement without defensiveness, and create clarity when teams feel unsettled.

For HR and people managers, the model also connects closely to culture. If you're trying to strengthen trust, belonging, and shared habits across a distributed workforce, this guide on improving workplace culture is a useful companion to Tuckman's framework.

The Five Stages of Group Development Explained

A helpful way to remember Tuckman's stages is to think about building a house. You don't start by living comfortably in it. First, people gather, plans take shape, problems appear, systems settle, and eventually the work ends.

Forming

This is the foundation stage. The team has just come together, and people are working out who's who.

Most members are polite. They're trying to understand the goal, the leader's expectations, and how much initiative is welcome. In remote teams, forming often shows up as careful, slightly stiff communication. People wait to be invited before speaking, and meetings can feel pleasant but vague.

Typical signs include:

• Cautious participation: People contribute, but they rarely challenge anything yet.
• Heavy reliance on the leader: Team members look for structure, agendas, and decisions from one person.
• Unclear roles: Everyone knows the project matters, but not everyone knows exactly what they own.

Storming

This is when the house build gets messy. The plans meet reality.

Different working styles start to collide. One person wants speed, another wants detail. Someone thinks decisions should happen in meetings, someone else prefers written updates. In this stage, friction becomes visible.

Storming doesn't mean the team is broken. It means the team has moved beyond first impressions.

Teams often improve because they learn to disagree well, not because they avoid disagreement.

You might notice tension about authority, deadlines, tools, communication style, or ownership. In hybrid settings, this stage can be especially uncomfortable because misunderstandings grow quickly when people are split across locations.

Norming

Now the house has structure. The team begins to settle into shared habits.

People stop spending so much energy on jockeying for position. They begin to trust each other's intentions more. Roles become clearer, and routines start to feel natural.

A norming team usually shows these behaviours:

Stage signal	What it looks like
Shared expectations	People know how updates are given and how decisions are made
More open communication	Concerns are raised earlier and with less drama
Growing trust	Team members ask for help without fearing judgment

Norming doesn't mean perfect harmony. It means the team has developed workable agreements.

Performing

This is the stage leaders want, but it's easy to misunderstand. Performing isn't just “everyone's busy”. It's when the team works well with less supervision because people trust the process and each other.

At this point, the house is livable. People know where things belong, how problems get solved, and how to keep things running.

A performing team usually has:

• Clear accountability: Work moves without constant chasing.
• Constructive conflict: Disagreements happen, but they don't derail momentum.
• Adaptability: People adjust when priorities shift.
• Collective focus: Team members care about the result, not just their own task list.

Adjourning

This final stage is often skipped in casual summaries of the model, but it matters. The project ends, the temporary team closes, or people move on.

This is the moving-out phase of the house analogy. The work is complete, but the ending still needs handling. Some people feel proud. Others feel flat, relieved, or unexpectedly emotional.

Key takeaway: A team's ending deserves as much care as its launch.

Good adjourning includes reflection, recognition, handover, and closure. That's especially important in schools, charities, project teams, and short-term working groups where the team may never gather in the same form again.

How to Diagnose Your Team's Current Stage

Managers often ask the wrong question. They ask whether the team is good or bad, engaged or disengaged, aligned or misaligned. A better question is simpler. What behaviour is the team showing repeatedly right now?

Diagnosis starts with observation, not guesswork.

What to watch in meetings and messages

A team in Forming often sounds organised on the surface but thin underneath. Meetings are polite, updates are cautious, and few people test assumptions. Team members may agree quickly because they don't yet feel safe enough to disagree.

A team in Storming has more energy, but less ease. Meetings contain interruptions, defensiveness, repeated debates, or side conversations after the call. In writing, you may notice confusion around ownership, tone, or response expectations.

A team in Norming starts to feel steadier. People reference shared processes instead of personal preferences. They resolve minor issues without escalating everything upward.

A team in Performing spends less time negotiating basics and more time delivering. You see initiative, trust, and faster recovery when things go wrong.

A team in Adjourning becomes future-focused. Conversations shift toward wrap-up, documentation, celebration, and transition.

A practical checklist

Use this quick test with your next team meeting:

• If people are agreeable but hesitant: You're probably in Forming.
• If disagreement is frequent and emotionally loaded: You're likely in Storming.
• If routines are settling and conflict is less personal: That points to Norming.
• If work flows with high autonomy: You're likely in Performing.
• If people are finishing, reflecting, or preparing to leave: That's Adjourning.

Here's an extra clue. Don't focus only on output. A team can hit deadlines while still sitting in unresolved storming behaviour. The result may look fine for a while, but the strain shows up in turnover risk, miscommunication, or burnout.

Questions that reveal the stage quickly

Ask these in a one-to-one or retrospective:

1. Do people know what's expected of them?
2. Can team members disagree safely?
3. Are working norms explicit or still assumed?
4. Does the leader need to intervene in small issues constantly?
5. Is the team building momentum or preparing to close?

If you want a stronger read on team patterns, structured listening helps. This guide to feedback collection methods is useful when you need more than intuition and want to gather honest signals from a group.

Guiding Your Team Through Forming and Storming

The first two stages shape everything that follows. If you rush them, the team pays for it later through confusion, resentment, and duplicated work.

A leader's job in these stages isn't to force instant closeness. It's to create enough clarity and safety that people can start working honestly.

What to do in Forming

In Forming, people need structure more than inspiration. They want to know why the team exists, what success looks like, who is responsible for what, and how communication will work.

For a remote or hybrid team, don't leave introductions to chance. A short pre-meeting activity can help people share a professional goal, a preferred working style, or a personal detail they're comfortable disclosing. That kind of light social context reduces awkwardness and gives the first live meeting something real to build on.

Some teams use a group online card or an online leaving card style board adapted for onboarding, where members post a short intro, photo, or welcome note. The same format can work as a group greeting card, group online card, or simple digital team wall. It sounds informal, but it helps people move from “strangers on a call” to “recognisable colleagues”.

A leader in Forming should focus on three basics:

• Clarify the mission: State the purpose in plain language.
• Define first responsibilities: Don't wait for role confusion to sort itself out.
• Set communication rules: Explain where updates happen, how urgent issues are flagged, and what response times are reasonable.

How to handle Storming without panic

Storming is the phase many managers mishandle. They either clamp down too hard or avoid the tension altogether.

In the UK, studies on remote and hybrid team development found that approximately 68% of new teams experience a distinct storming phase within the first 4–6 weeks, and that it correlates with a 22% temporary drop in productivity before norming begins, according to Bitesize Learning's summary of UK team development patterns.

That matters because it reminds leaders that conflict isn't a surprise. It's part of team formation.

Don't ask people to “be more collaborative” when the real issue is role ambiguity.

Storming usually improves when the team names the friction specifically. Is the problem decision rights, unclear ownership, tool overload, meeting etiquette, or inconsistent deadlines? Once the issue is concrete, it's easier to solve.

A practical approach is to hold a short reset conversation around these prompts:

• Where are we seeing repeated friction?
• What assumptions are people making that haven't been agreed?
• Which decisions belong to the manager, and which belong to the team?
• What communication habits are helping, and which are annoying everyone?

Later, when the team is ready for more energy-building activity, this guide on improving team engagement can help leaders reinforce connection without pretending conflict never happened.

A useful explainer for managers training new team leads is below.

Fostering High Performance in Norming and Performing

Once a team starts to stabilise, the leader's work changes. You're no longer introducing the group to itself or refereeing every disagreement. You're protecting the conditions that let good work continue.

That's the key challenge in Norming and Performing. Teams don't stay effective by accident.

Strengthening Norming

Norming is where teams often feel relieved and then get lazy. The tension has eased, people understand each other better, and meetings are smoother. That's good, but it's also the moment to lock in what's working.

Write down the norms that have emerged. Don't leave them unspoken.

That might include:

• Meeting expectations: When cameras are optional, how agendas are shared, and who captures actions.
• Communication etiquette: Which channel is used for updates, decisions, and urgent issues.
• Decision rules: When consensus is needed and when one person decides.
• Support habits: How team members ask for help and flag blockers early.

A short team charter often does more than a long policy. It captures the group's real agreements in language people will use.

The best team norms are specific enough to guide behaviour and simple enough to remember.

Sustaining Performing

Performing teams need a different kind of leadership. Less directing. More removing obstacles.

At this stage, managers should protect focus, reduce unnecessary approvals, and recognise the behaviours that keep the team effective. Recognition matters because it reinforces the habits the team wants to repeat.

That's one reason digital recognition tools have become so common. The Online Greetings Card Retailers industry in the United Kingdom had a market size of £338.7 million in 2026, with 446 businesses operating in this sector, according to IBISWorld's UK industry overview. That doesn't prove team health on its own, but it does show a sizeable market for digital connection tools.

In practice, many organisations now use shared appreciation spaces that work like a kudoboard alternative or groupgreeting alternative, where colleagues can post thanks, milestones, photos, GIFs, or short videos. A team might use an ecard, a personalized ecard, or a lightweight recognition board to celebrate a launch, mark a project win, or welcome a new starter. Some teams also use a birthday ecard, ecard birthday, or birthday ecard tradition to keep personal connection alive even when people rarely meet in person.

What high-performing teams still need

Even strong teams drift if nobody tends them. Watch for these risks:

Risk	What the leader should do
Complacency	Refresh goals and raise the bar carefully
Invisible overload	Check capacity, not just delivery status
Recognition gaps	Celebrate effort, learning, and contribution
Dependence on a few people	Spread knowledge and rotate responsibility

If you're trying to make performance conversations more consistent, this resource on performance benchmarking can help anchor expectations in observable standards rather than vague impressions.

Managing The Final Stage Adjourning with Grace

Many leaders treat the end of a project like admin. Finish the work, send the files, thank people quickly, move on. That approach misses something important. Adjourning isn't just a shutdown step. It's where meaning gets captured.

When a team closes well, people leave with clarity, appreciation, and useful learning. When it closes badly, the organisation loses both morale and knowledge.

Why Adjourning deserves more attention

This stage matters even more in modern work because so many teams are temporary. Cross-functional squads, student groups, event teams, campaign teams, volunteer teams, and transformation projects often come together for a fixed purpose and then dissolve.

The broader digital environment reflects that shift. The UK virtual cards market generated USD 1,454.3 million in revenue in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 4,500.1 million by 2030, according to Grand View Research's UK virtual cards outlook. That projection points to growing use of digital card formats in everyday professional and personal moments.

A better closing routine

A good adjourning process usually includes four actions:

• Review the work: What did the team achieve, and what should the next team know?
• Capture lessons: What should be repeated, changed, or dropped next time?
• Recognise contribution: Name effort as well as outcome.
• Mark the ending: Give people a moment that feels real.

Digital rituals can be particularly helpful. Teams often create a virtual leaving card, digital leaving card, or sorry for leaving card collection for a departing colleague, but the same idea can support project closure too. A simple board where team members post favourite moments, lessons learned, and thanks can turn a rushed ending into a proper farewell. It works especially well when the team is spread across cities or countries and can't gather physically.

If you need wording ideas for that final message, this guide on how to say goodbye to colleagues is practical and easy to adapt.

Common Criticisms and Modern Adaptations of Tuckman

Tuckman's model is useful, but it isn't a machine. Real teams don't always move neatly from one stage to the next.

A team can slide backwards after a reorganisation, a new manager, or a missed deadline. Agile teams may appear to be performing in one sprint and then return to storming when priorities change. Short-term project groups may never fully settle before they disband.

That's one reason an important question keeps coming up: How does Tuckman's model apply to short-term, project-based teams? The issue is often handled poorly, and many UK-focused management resources treat Adjourning as optional or ignore it, as discussed in Infed's overview of Bruce W. Tuckman and group development.

How to use the model without becoming rigid

Use the stages as a lens, not a rulebook.

• Expect movement, not perfection: Teams may loop between stages.
• Adapt for time-bound groups: A short project still needs forming, storming, and closure, even if each happens quickly.
• Read context carefully: Remote work, leadership change, and outside pressure all affect team behaviour.

This kind of flexible thinking shows up in other developmental models too. If you're interested in how staged frameworks are adapted beyond workplace teams, the stages of family development theory offers a useful comparison in a different context.

Tuckman's lasting value is that it helps leaders stop personalising normal team tension. Instead of assuming conflict means failure, they can respond with clearer structure, better conversations, and stronger closure.

---

If your team wants a simple way to celebrate milestones, welcome new starters, or create a thoughtful Firacard for farewells and birthdays, it's an easy tool for building connection across remote and hybrid work. From a collaborative group greeting card to a virtual leaving card or personalized ecard, it helps people contribute in one place and makes shared moments feel human again.

Share It